| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Date: | 2000-10-16 04:44:15 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20001016144415.02814320@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Since we may have a workable backup/restore based on WAL available in 7.1,
I am now wondering at the wisdom of creating 'pg_restore', which reads the
new pg_dump archive files. It is probably better to have pg_backup &
pg_restore as the backup/restore utilities.
As a result do people have any objection to changing pg_restore to
pg_undump? Or pg_load?
Any other suggestions would also be welcome.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-16 04:45:50 | Re: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2000-10-16 04:42:56 | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml (jdbc.sgml) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-16 04:45:50 | Re: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-16 04:41:49 | Re: Performance on inserts |