| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC |
| Date: | 2000-09-28 16:06:50 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000929020650.0414c9c0@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 11:01 28/09/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>A data-only reload
>would fail to make that guarantee unless you drop and recreate
>the sequence.
Will this cause problems in an existing database because the sequence OID
changes?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-09-28 16:25:24 | Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-09-28 15:52:24 | Re: pg_dump and sequences - RFC |