Re: Proposal for supporting outer joins in 7.1

At 16:07 25/08/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> For example:
>
>SELECT ... FROM a,b,c
> Planner will consider all three possible join orders:
> (a cross join b) cross join c
> (a cross join c) cross join b
> (b cross join c) cross join a
>
>SELECT ... FROM (a cross join b) cross join c
> Planner will only consider joining a with b and then adding c.
>

I'm not sure whether the above is the syntax you plan to use, but it looks
a little too much like:

SELECT ... FROM (select * from a cross join b) as z cross join c

which has a quite different meaning to any kind of outer join, and the
parenthesis, in this case, should not affect the planner choices. I don;t
think that support for this kind of query is implemented, but it could
confuse things a little.

As an aside, while you are in there, I don't suppose you would be able to
implement that above syntax as well? Then, maybe, have a go at the common
cold, too.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/