Re: pg_dump & ownership (again)

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump & ownership (again)
Date: 2000-08-01 23:12:02
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20000802091202.0270e100@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 15:49 1/08/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>The BLOB access code contains no permissions checks --- which is likely
>a bug in itself, but anyway if you know the OID of a large object you
>can do anything you want to it via the lo_xxx functions.

This is good to know; I really hope that a new BLOB implementation can come
out of TOAST, and get rid of this mess ASAP...

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-08-01 23:42:04 Re: Anyone care about type "filename" ?
Previous Message Mike Sears 2000-08-01 22:26:36 Re: random() function produces wrong range