| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump & performance degradation |
| Date: | 2000-08-01 04:56:51 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000801145651.02f0e520@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
At 14:38 1/08/00 +1000, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
>Is this the sort of problem that nice() might solve, or not?
>
Doesn't seem to; the problem is the IO, I think. Besides, it's a bad idea
to change priorities on backend processes (which is where most of the work
is done).
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | brianb-pggeneral | 2000-08-01 05:36:58 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump & performance degradation |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-08-01 04:38:43 | Re: pg_dump & performance degradation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | brianb-pggeneral | 2000-08-01 05:36:58 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump & performance degradation |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-08-01 04:38:43 | Re: pg_dump & performance degradation |