| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgres 7.2 features. |
| Date: | 2000-07-11 06:37:13 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000711163713.023ba8e0@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 11:27 11/07/00 +1000, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
>> It was mentioned here that triggers could be used for async replication,
>> as well as WAL.
>
>Same story. Major inefficency. Replication is tough enough without
>mucking
>around with triggers. Once the trigger executes you've got to go and
>store
>the data in the database again anyway. Then figure out when to delete
>it.
>
The WAL *should* be the most efficient technique for replication (this said
without actually having seen it ;-}).
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-11 07:05:42 | Re: Storage Manager (was postgres 7.2 features.) |
| Previous Message | Marten Feldtmann | 2000-07-11 06:14:34 | Re: Alternative new libpq interface. |