Re: pg_backup symlink?

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_backup symlink?
Date: 2000-07-10 23:16:31
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20000711091631.02a00cc0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

At 18:58 10/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>There are dozens of other examples in any standard Unix system. Just
>to take one example, 'ls' has six different links to it on my Unix box,
>and they all act differently (ie, supply different default switches to
>the basic 'ls' behavior).
>
>Peter is definitely swimming upstream if he hopes to get anyone to adopt
>the above as received wisdom.
>

Does this mean that using a pg_backup symlink would be deemed acceptable?

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Graeme Merrall 2000-07-10 23:19:47 Re: Slashdot discussion
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-07-10 23:12:02 pg_dump with BLOBS & V7.0.2 fix

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Graeme Merrall 2000-07-10 23:19:47 Re: Slashdot discussion
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-07-10 23:12:02 pg_dump with BLOBS & V7.0.2 fix