| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: Re: postgres TODO |
| Date: | 2000-07-10 14:14:32 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000711001432.02511210@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 15:58 10/07/00 +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
>OID access is not indexed by default, only if the dba created a
>corresponding
>index. Thus OID access is a seq scan in a default environment.
>
Sticking my head out even further, this seems like a good reason to use
'insert/update...returning' - isn't the tuple already on the heap, and
easily available at the end of the insert/update?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-10 14:26:30 | Re: More info |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-10 14:12:46 | Re: Re: [BUGS] Unnexpected results using to_number() |