Re: heap_create with OID?

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: heap_create with OID?
Date: 2000-07-05 05:12:56
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20000705151256.02461a40@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 09:42 5/07/00 +1000, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>Philip Warner wrote:
>
>> Updating OIDs sounds like a *very* scary thing to do.
>
>It's scary, but useful in some specific situations. Restoring lost data
>is an obvious one. There would be applications in writing certain forms
>of database replication schemes. There is also a technique in object
>databases where the client side code has to know what the oid for an
>object will be before it is actually added to the database.

None of these strictly involve updating OIDs; they seem to be choosing OIDs
at creation time, which is a very different thing.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-05 05:15:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable?
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-07-05 05:10:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this more palatable?