| From: | Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: lots of large objects and toast |
| Date: | 2000-05-30 03:34:27 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000530113427.0085dc00@pop.mecomb.po.my |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 11:22 PM 29-05-2000 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com> writes:
>> Is there a pipe method where I can continuously print to/read from?
>
>Not at the moment, but that's obviously going to be a necessary feature
>if we want to make the existing flavor of large objects obsolete. There
>have been some preliminary discussions about it --- AFAIR no one's laid
>out a complete proposal yet.
Will such a "TOAST" and pg_dump interoperate? That would be nice to have.
But if that's not possible then maybe new dump and load tools will be
needed which cover everything. If not there'll be a new line on the FAQ - I
dumped XXX and reloaded but it's not there.
How do the other databases do BLOBS? Which ones do it well :).
Have a nice day!
Link.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brett W. McCoy | 2000-05-30 03:41:00 | Re: Postgresql usage clip. |
| Previous Message | Ron Chmara | 2000-05-30 03:30:37 | Re: Postgresql usage clip. |