| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: vacuum analyze feedback |
| Date: | 2000-05-26 03:31:33 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000526133133.0226b840@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 15:54 25/05/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>Yes, I think eventually, we need to feed information about actual query
>results back into the optimizer for use in later queries.
>
You could be a little more ambituous and do what Dec/Rdb does - use the
results of current query execution to (possibly) cause a change in the
current strategy.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: +61-03-5367 7422 | _________ \
Fax: +61-03-5367 7430 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-26 03:40:13 | Re: smgrwrite() without LockBuffer(was RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ?) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-26 03:31:24 | Re: vacuum analyze feedback |