Re: rtree indexes aren't being used with 7.0

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rtree indexes aren't being used with 7.0
Date: 2000-05-16 01:09:15
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20000516090915.008f5100@pop.mecomb.po.my
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 11:13 AM 15-05-2000 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com> writes:
>Actually, the cost estimator for indexscans is deliberately not linear,
>since it's trying to model the effects of hits in a buffer cache ...
>perhaps that's a pointless refinement when we have no accurate idea of
>the size of the kernel's buffer cache, but certainly the real-world
>behavior is not going to be linear.

Just have something like a few linear "curves" and some IF statements?
That's often good enough in real world scenarios- the whole point about
fuzzy logic. Works very well for high speed lifts, and other seemingly
complex control situations.

Cheerio,
Link.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2000-05-16 02:52:42 RPMS for 7.0 final.
Previous Message Dragos Stoichita 2000-05-16 00:59:26 Why is the INTERSECT so slow?