Re: beta testing version

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Ron Chmara <ron(at)opus1(dot)com>, Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)venux(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Date: 2000-11-28 22:58:12
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20001128145812.017828e0@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 03:25 PM 11/28/00 -0700, Ron Chmara wrote:
>Mitch Vincent wrote:
>>
>> This is one of the not-so-stomped boxes running PostgreSQL -- I've never
>> restarted PostgreSQL on it since it was installed.
>> 12:03pm up 122 days, 7:54, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.11, 0.09
>> I had some index corruption problems in 6.5.3 but since 7.0.X I haven't
>> heard so much as a peep from any PostgreSQL backend. It's superbly stable on
>> all my machines..
>
>I have a 6.5.x box at 328 days of active use.
>
>Crash "recovery" seems silly to me. :-)

Well, not really ... but since our troll is a devoted MySQL user, it's a bit
of a red-herring anyway, at least as regards his own server.

You know, the one he's afraid to put Postgres on, but sleeps soundly at
night knowing the mighty bullet-proof MySQL with its full transaction
semantics, archive logging and recovery from REDO logs and all that
will save him? :)

Again ... he's a troll, not even a very entertaining one.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-11-28 23:10:58 Re: beta testing version
Previous Message Ron Chmara 2000-11-28 22:25:05 Re: beta testing version