Re: Why Not MySQL?

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)huntsvilleal(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why Not MySQL?
Date: 2000-05-03 16:38:41
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000503093841.00f0fd50@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 11:44 AM 5/3/00 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

>My experience so far is that it was basically a 'plug-n-play' sort of
>thing ... dump your database, upgrade and reload ... the only problem I
>had was one script that I did something like:
>
>SELECT field as field

I was able to dump my birdnotes.net database and reload it without change,
if another datapoint will help your boss's confidence level.

>without realizing it, and v7.0 won't allow that (field == field) ... other
>then that, *much* more stable, and appears faster then the old ...

My system had one query in particular that suffered from a poor
plan (a very bad nested loop), the changes to the optimizer have
resulted in a much better plan in 7.0 which just flies. I've been
very happy with 7.0.

Tell your boss we're smarter than he is and switch :)

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-03 17:08:42 Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-03 16:32:17 Re: 7.0RC2 compile error !