Re: [INTERFACES] Problem with Large Object Interface of pgsql_perl5

From: Ken Causey <ken(at)premiernet(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Problem with Large Object Interface of pgsql_perl5
Date: 2000-03-31 19:39:06
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000331133906.017ba9f0@premiernet.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces

Edmund Mergl was kind enough to point out my error and now
that I look back at the Programmer's documentation I see it. Someone
might want to update the Pg man page to reflect this. Thanks!

Ken Causey
PremierNET, Inc.

At 01:11 PM 3/31/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>Ken Causey <ken(at)premiernet(dot)net> writes:
>> Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
>
>Not doing the lo_open inside a transaction. You need begin ... end
>around any use of an open large object. (This has always been true,
>but older versions of Postgres didn't enforce it --- they'd just die
>occasionally if you broke the rule. Now, open LO handles are auto-
>closed at transaction commit, which is to say at end of statement
>if you're not inside a BEGIN block.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message brad 2000-03-31 19:42:51 Re: doing backups
Previous Message Herbert Liechti 2000-03-31 18:53:28 Re: Apache::Session in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guido Medina 2000-03-31 21:01:31 Java & postgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-03-31 18:11:18 Re: Problem with Large Object Interface of pgsql_perl5