| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN |
| Date: | 2000-02-29 00:36:07 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000228163607.00ecb4f0@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 02:04 AM 2/29/00 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>IIRC, the same behaviour plagued the old foreign key implementation
>in contrib, which was why it was refused for a long time to be
>integrated.
>
>I hope that at least the foreig keys don't do it anymore.
It shouldn't because they're implemented via triggers after all the
work is done. In other words, the implementation might have bugs
but the bugs should be different :)
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-02-29 00:43:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-02-29 00:31:41 | Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) |