From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | bruc(at)acm(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright |
Date: | 2000-01-29 15:07:34 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000129070734.0103b5b0@mail.pacifier.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 02:10 AM 1/29/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>If anyone wants to look into Apache and see how it's set up, I've got no
>problem with taking a look. I think it's real easy to make a mountain
>out of a molehill in this area, however. Look at FSF --- they actually
>require signed paperwork (hard copy, not email) from any potential
>contributor before they will accept code contributions. Do we want to
>get that anal-retentive? I hope not.
Yes, in spirit I'm certainly with you on this one. I presume some
laywer started hacking code in his spare time then started hacking
the FSF as well :)
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-29 15:48:36 | RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug? |
Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-01-29 15:00:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Copyright |