| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |
| Date: | 2000-01-25 15:41:38 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000125074138.00f752c0@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
At 05:00 PM 1/25/00 +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
>Out of curiosity, does the SQL spec give any rules or guidelines about when
>aggregates should be applied to resultant rows? Or is it one of the
>implementation-dependant things?
Well...my copy of Date's now actually in the mail, rather than in
Boston, but at the moment that's not much help!
"order by" happens after everything, AFAIK. For instance...
select ...
union
select ...
order by
orders the result of the union, which pretty much implies that
aggregates will happen first.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-01-25 15:53:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-25 15:40:00 | RE: [HACKERS] Sure enough, SI buffer overrun is broken |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Palle Girgensohn | 2000-01-25 16:03:05 | Re: [SQL] Duplicate tuples with unique index |
| Previous Message | Julian Scarfe | 2000-01-25 13:23:58 | Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |