Re: [HACKERS] LONG

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck), pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: wieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LONG
Date: 1999-12-11 15:09:28
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.19991211070928.01087c40@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 01:48 PM 12/11/99 +0100, Jan Wieck wrote:

> I thought to use a regular table. Of course, it will eat
> buffers, but managing external files or even large objects
> for it IMHO isn't that simple, if you take transaction
> commit/abort and MVCC problematic into account too. And IMHO
> this is something that must be covered, because I meant to
> create a DATATYPE that can be used as a replacement for TEXT
> if that's too small, so it must behave as a regular datatype,
> without any restrictions WRT beeing able to rollback etc.

Yes, please, this is what (some of, at least) the world wants.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-11 15:20:50 Re: [HACKERS] LONG
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-12-11 14:51:44 Re: Mirroring a DB