Re: [HACKERS] money data type and conversions

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] money data type and conversions
Date: 1999-06-23 05:44:20
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.19990622224420.00e4aa14@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 01:52 AM 6/23/99 +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

>NUMERIC and DECIMAL are (or should be, if there are rough edges since
>they are so new) are the SQL92-way to represent currency. And, they
>are compatible with all different conventions, since you can set the
>decimal place and size of the fractional part as you want.

This is an excellent point. The portable and standard numeric
and decimal types are the way to go.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 1999-06-23 12:04:09 Re: [HACKERS] The dangers of "-F"
Previous Message Don Baccus 1999-06-23 05:43:48 Re: [HACKERS] The dangers of "-F"