Re: Procedure support improvements

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rader <david(dot)rader(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Procedure support improvements
Date: 2019-08-26 17:43:45
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer wrote:
> As I said, I'd entertain a connection parameter that switched the
> CALL to call procedures but ideally you'd complain to the server
> folks to make Procedures useful.

Apart from the obvious problem that procedures make life hard for the
JDBC driver, because it does not know if it shall render a call as
What is missing in PostgreSQL procedures to make them useful?

Laurenz Albe

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-08-26 17:46:04 Re: Creating partitions automatically at least on HASH?
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2019-08-26 17:34:18 Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2019-08-26 17:48:23 Re: Procedure support improvements
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2019-08-26 17:02:24 Re: Procedure support improvements