Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?

From:	Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Lists <lists(at)on-track(dot)ca>
Cc:	Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?
Date:	2009-04-16 08:11:08
Message-ID:	2f4958ff0904160111s42bb6326g6ee83c7691e2b7e4@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2009-04-10 06:43:01 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>  2009-04-10 13:50:37 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2009-04-10 17:07:49 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>    2009-04-10 17:19:36 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2009-04-10 17:46:43 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>      2009-04-16 06:02:29 from Lists <lists(at)on-track(dot)ca>       2009-04-16 08:11:08 from Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>       2009-04-16 12:06:13 from Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>        2009-04-16 15:36:34 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>       2009-04-16 15:42:43 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>        2009-04-16 15:52:32 from Lists <lists(at)on-track(dot)ca>         2009-04-16 16:01:12 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2009-04-14 09:39:22 from Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Lists:	pgsql-performance

In response to

• Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? at 2009-04-16 06:02:29 from Lists

Browse pgsql-performance by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Albe Laurenz	2009-04-16 09:22:46	Re: need information
Previous Message	Lists	2009-04-16 06:02:29	Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?