Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Date: 2008-12-02 02:49:58
Message-ID: 2f4958ff0812011849t4750bag92e781a06cdeb1b6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>wrote:

> Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>
>>
>> well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How
>> reliable it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a step
>> ahead in that regard. Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :)
>>
>
> Actually, he has a couple of them:
>
> pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> .

which reminds me, of my favourite recent quote:
"Think I'll go fix this while I'm watching the football game ..."

--
GJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2008-12-02 03:09:08 Favorite Tom Lane quotes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-12-02 01:54:16 Re: slow, long-running 'commit prepared'