| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Readd use of TAP subtests |
| Date: | 2022-02-28 16:02:56 |
| Message-ID: | 2f2cb461-f943-b8c8-3cdc-221e47263c1b@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25.02.22 17:26, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Ok that's good to know. What exactly happens when it tries to parse them?
>> Does it not count them or does it fail somehow? The way the output is
>> structured
> Says that it can't pase a line of the tap output:
Ok, then I suppose I'm withdrawing this.
Perhaps in another 7 years or so this will be resolved and we can make
another attempt at this. ;-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-02-28 16:24:49 | Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-02-28 16:00:05 | Re: Expose JIT counters/timing in pg_stat_statements |