On 3/7/17 11:16, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well, if the problem you're trying to solve is "retain WAL for as long
> as possible without running out of disk space and having everything go
> kablooey", then it would solve that problem, and I think that's a very
> reasonable problem to want to solve.
Could be. I'm not sure what that means for the presented patch, though.
Or whether it addresses Michael's original use case at all.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services