Re: logical decoding / rewrite map vs. maxAllocatedDescs

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical decoding / rewrite map vs. maxAllocatedDescs
Date: 2018-08-09 17:58:57
Message-ID: 2eeb2d11-70be-edbe-198a-a73a30d58664@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/09/2018 07:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Aug-09, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> I suppose there are reasons why it's done this way, and admittedly the test
>> that happens to trigger this is a bit extreme (essentially running pgbench
>> concurrently with 'vacuum full pg_class' in a loop). I'm not sure it's
>> extreme enough to deem it not an issue, because people using many temporary
>> tables often deal with bloat by doing frequent vacuum full on catalogs.
>
> Actually, it seems to me that ApplyLogicalMappingFile is just leaking
> the file descriptor for no good reason. There's a different
> OpenTransientFile call in ReorderBufferRestoreChanges that is not
> intended to be closed immediately, but the other one seems a plain bug,
> easy enough to fix.
>
>> But wait, there's more - what happens after hitting the limit? We restart
>> the decoding process, and end up getting this:
>>
>> ERROR: 53000: exceeded maxAllocatedDescs (492) while trying to open
>> file "pg_logical/mappings/map-4000-4eb-1_60DE1E08-5376b5-537c6b"
>> LOCATION: OpenTransientFile, fd.c:2161
>> LOG: 00000: starting logical decoding for slot "s"
>> DETAIL: streaming transactions committing after 1/6097DD48, reading
>> WAL from 1/60275848
>> LOCATION: CreateDecodingContext, logical.c:414
>> LOG: 00000: logical decoding found consistent point at 1/60275848
>> DETAIL: Logical decoding will begin using saved snapshot.
>> LOCATION: SnapBuildRestore, snapbuild.c:1872
>> ERROR: XX000: subtransaction logged without previous top-level txn
>> record
>
> Hmm, I wonder if we introduced some bug in f49a80c481f7.
>

That's possible. I'm running on f85537a88d, i.e. with f49a80c481f7.

>> I'd say this implies the "can't open file" is handled in a way that corrupts
>> the mapping files, making it impossible to restart the decoding. AFAICS the
>> only option at this point is to drop the subscription and start over.
>
> Wow, that seems pretty serious. Clearly that's a different bug that
> must be fixed.
>

Yep.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Kohn 2018-08-09 18:12:41 Re: POC for a function trust mechanism
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-08-09 17:58:46 Re: logical decoding / rewrite map vs. maxAllocatedDescs