| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgstat_send_connstats() introduces unnecessary timestamp and UDP overhead |
| Date: | 2021-09-01 03:42:19 |
| Message-ID: | 2e880e5e5e6ad7b9787609c4f7fe13634ac094dc.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2021-09-01 at 10:33 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 04:55:35AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > In the view of that, how about doubling PGSTAT_STAT_INTERVAL to 1000
> > milliseconds?
>
> Perhaps we could do that. Now, increasing an interval for the sake of
> balancing the extra load created by a feature while impacting the
> whole set of stats is not really appealing.
I agree. But if the best fix is too invasive at this point, the
alternatives are reverting the patch or choosing a less appealing
solution.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-09-01 03:50:02 | Re: improve pg_receivewal code |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-09-01 03:39:14 | Re: pgstat_send_connstats() introduces unnecessary timestamp and UDP overhead |