Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Stuart Brooks" <stuartb(at)cat(dot)co(dot)za>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong
Date: 2008-04-03 16:51:24
Message-ID: 2e78013d0804030951m54c866b9y29ffcf06469318b3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> I've applied a modified/extended form of this patch for 8.3.2.
>

Thanks. I had another concern about VACUUM not reporting DEAD line
pointers (please see up thread). Any comments on that ?

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2008-04-03 16:52:45 Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-04-03 16:51:05 Re: deadlock

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2008-04-03 16:52:45 Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Previous Message Steve Atkins 2008-04-03 16:50:28 Re: modules