| From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |
| Date: | 2007-09-13 16:57:50 |
| Message-ID: | 2e78013d0709130957j371c8a83vbbb6530e583ab3ce@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On 9/13/07, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yeah, I just checked the work-in-progress patch I sent you back in July.
> I refactored it to use one-based offsets for consistency, since I
> modified log_heap_clean quite heavily anyway.
>
> It's possible that I broke it in the process, I was only interested in
> testing the performance characteristics of the simplified pruning scheme.
>
>
I don't think so -- atleast I couldn't figure out why its broken. But I
would take Tom's comment seriously and look more into it tomorrow.
Or we can just revert it back to zero-based offsets.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-13 17:52:37 | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-09-13 16:42:40 | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |