| From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch queue triage |
| Date: | 2007-05-02 05:56:43 |
| Message-ID: | 2e78013d0705012256s5109a894t3512100f3557080e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/2/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>
>
> * [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement
> /Pavan Deolasee/
>
> I'm not very excited about this --- it seems to me to complicate the code
> in some places that are not in fact performance-critical. While it
> doesn't seem likely to break things, I'm not in favor of reducing code
> readability unless a measurable performance improvement can be shown.
> Can we have some tests showing this is worthwhile?
>
>
>
I am OK with dropping this for the time being. It came out of code
reading. I would later run some tests to see if it really gives any
performance benefit.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-05-02 06:08:40 | Re: Patch queue triage |
| Previous Message | Naz Gassiep | 2007-05-02 05:38:03 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |