Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2

On 2/20/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> > When following a HOT-update chain from the index fetch, if we notice
> that
> > the root tuple is dead and it is HOT-updated, we try to prune the chain
> to
> > the smallest possible length. To do that, the share lock is upgraded to
> an
> > exclusive lock and the tuple chain is followed till we find a
> > live/recently-dead
> > tuple. At that point, the root t_ctid is made point to that tuple. In
> order
>
> I assume you meant recently-dead here, rather than live/recently-dead,
> because we aren't going to change live ctids, right?

No, I meant live or recently-dead (in fact, anything other than
HEAPTUPLE_DEAD
or HEAPTUPLE_DEAD_CHAIN).

We are not changing the tids here, but only pruning the HOT-update chain.
After pruning, the root->t_ctid points to the oldest tuple that might be
visible to any backend. The live tuples are still identified by their
original tid and index reachable from the root tuple.

Thanks,
Pavan

--

EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com