Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.
Date: 2021-11-02 17:35:43
Message-ID: 2e40c2274d1b6b3479d5b52315687b3c1b52bafa.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 11:06 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Just as a sort of general comment on this endeavor, I suspect that
> any
> attempt to lump things together that seem closely related is doomed
> to
> backfire.

Agreed, I think that is apparent from the different opinions in this
thread.

Robert had a good idea over here though:

https://postgr.es/m/20211101165025.GS20998@tamriel.snowman.net

which gives fine-grained control without the "clutter" of extra
predefined roles.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-11-02 17:43:46 Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
Previous Message David Steele 2021-11-02 17:33:50 Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?