| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Date: | 2017-04-08 14:10:18 |
| Message-ID: | 2ccb5bb1-8e45-199c-e915-f0c7e8139964@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/7/17 10:19 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
>
> I rebased the early free patch (patch 3) to apply on top of the v9
> patch 2 (it needed some changes). I recognize the early free patch
> didn't get nearly as much scrutiny, so I'm fine with commiting only 2
> if that one's ready to go but 3 isn't.
>
> If it's decided to go for fixed 128M segments and a binary search of
> segments, I don't think I can get that ready and tested before the
> commitfest ends.
This submission has been moved to CF 2017-07.
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2017-04-08 14:12:25 | Re: Bug in to_timestamp(). |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2017-04-08 14:08:35 | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |