Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1

From: "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1
Date: 2012-02-27 21:23:22
Message-ID: 2cbd74f0d85e61771f06b7888a967454.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Obviously, I am missing something important here. The
database in question is created thusly:

CREATE DATABASE test
WITH OWNER = devl
ENCODING = 'UTF8'
TABLESPACE = pg_default
LC_COLLATE = 'en_US.UTF-8'
LC_CTYPE = 'en_US.UTF-8'
CONNECTION LIMIT = -1;

The manual says this:

Loading an extension requires the same privileges that
would be required to create its component objects. For
most extensions this means superuser or database owner
privileges are needed. The user who runs CREATE EXTENSION
becomes the owner of the extension for purposes of later
privilege checks, as well as the owner of any objects
created by the extension's script.

However, looking at the extension properties shows this:

-- Extension: plpgsql

-- DROP EXTENSION plpgsql;

CREATE EXTENSION plpgsql
SCHEMA pg_catalog
VERSION "1.0";
ALTER EXTENSION plpgsql
OWNER TO postgres;

So, why is the plpgsql extension in test owned by postgres
and not by devl to begin with?

--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB(at)Harte-Lyne(dot)ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-02-27 21:37:24 Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1
Previous Message James B. Byrne 2012-02-27 21:13:36 Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1