Re: [PATCH v1] Batch B-tree TIDs when building a bitmap

From: David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomás Senart <ts(at)perfloop(dot)ai>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Batch B-tree TIDs when building a bitmap
Date: 2026-10-09 09:11:39
Message-ID: 2b93f66d-0f8c-49d8-a76d-9add6a07a3b5@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The same optimization can be applied, by the way, to at least the GIST,
> the GIN and the HASH index implementations. I'll do that the next days
> when I find some time.
Done for B-tree, hash, GiST, GIN, SP-GiST, and bloom indexes.
Attached patch passes tests.

Also created a commit fest entry:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/7422/

--
David Geier

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Batch-TIDBitmap-insertions-in-index-scans.patch text/plain 11.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message lin teletele 2026-10-09 09:16:42 Re: [PATCH v1] Stale row estimates for transition tables
Previous Message jian he 2026-10-09 08:40:45 use indnkeyatts not indnatts in loops that read rd_indcollation