Re: pg_reorg in core?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Date: 2012-09-23 03:37:42
Message-ID: 2b64114dc1c9312dae598c2e98a5dd98@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> I think it's time to consider some *umbrella project* for maintaining
>> several small projects outside the core.
>
> Well, that was pgfoundry, and it didn't work out.

I'm not sure that is quite analogous to what was being proposed.
I read it as more of "let's package a bunch of these small utilities
together into a single project", such that installing one installs them
all (e.g. aptitude install pg_tools), and they all have a single bug
tracker, etc. That tracker could be github, of course.

I'm not convinced of the merit of that plan, but that's an alternative
interpretation that doesn't involve our beloved pgfoundry. :)

Oh, and -1 for putting it in core. Way too early, and not
important enough.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201209222334
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlBeg/AACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjL5ACgimT71B4lSb1ELhgMw5EBzAKs
xHIAn08vxGzmM6eSmDfZfxlJDTousq7h
=KgXW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-09-23 04:06:08 Re: 64-bit API for large object
Previous Message johnlumby 2012-09-23 01:52:58 Re: proposal and patch : support INSERT INTO...RETURNING with partitioned table using rule