| From: | "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Melanie <melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] |
| Date: | 2008-10-28 15:35:02 |
| Message-ID: | 2b5e566d0810280835m53a61826r9def1b9877033be8@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake escribió:
>
>> I was clarifying what is actually going on. There never was a
>> lists.postgresql.us list for discussion. There is a .us list for
>> discussion, it is pgus-general(at)postgresql(dot)org and it has never been
>> moderated.
>>
>> The ".us" list to which she is referring is members(at)(dot) That list was
>> designed to be an announcement list and is indeed moderated.
>
> I don't understand how this setup makes any sense at all. It is bound
> to be confusing. Why don't you guys have both lists under
> postgresql.us?
+1
-selena
--
Selena Deckelmann
PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-10-28 15:53:48 | Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-28 15:32:43 | Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] |