Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)

From: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy List" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)
Date: 2007-08-30 18:02:35
Message-ID: 2b5e566d0708301102s30cbd6dbk4370023efc8ad5fe@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 8/30/07, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> I am. What I object to is declaring this as a postgresql.org conference when it hasn't been generally agreed in an appropriate community forum (which would be -advocacy imho). Doing so effectively allows *anyone* to organise an event and call it 'official' - which I believe is definitely not something we want for a whole heap of reasons.
>

I would like for this to be an 'official' event.

How do we go about getting 'official' approval?

Thanks!
-selena

--
Selena Deckelmann
PDXPUG - Portland PostgreSQL Users Group
http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
http://www.postgresqlconference.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-30 18:14:25 Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-08-30 17:48:50 Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)