Re: Geographical multi-master replication

From: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Geographical multi-master replication
Date: 2019-01-25 05:45:43
Message-ID: 2b2bafe7-d9be-3af6-9eec-edcb9292924d@a-kretschmer.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Am 25.01.19 um 06:10 schrieb Jeremy Finzel:
>
> The problem is that the version for BDR 1.0.7, which has an
> implementation for postgres 9.4, will be on end of live at the end
> of this year. Unfortunately the paid solution is out of our
> budget, so we currently have two options: find an alternative or
> remove the multi-region implementation. We are currently looking
> for alternatives.
>
>
> You are missing all of the alternatives here.  Why don't you consider
> upgrading from postgres 9.4 and with it to a supported version of
> BDR?  There is nothing better you can do to keep your infrastructure
> up to date, performant, secure, and actually meet your multi-master
> needs than to upgrade to a newer version of postgres which does have
> BDR support.
>
> Even "stock" postgres 9.4 is set for end of life soon. Upgrade!

ACK!

Sure, you have to pay for a support contract, and this isn't for free,
but you will get a first-class support for BDR. If you really needs a
worldwide distributed multi-master solution you should be able to buy that.

Regards, Andreas

--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2019-01-25 06:02:34 Re: [pgbackrest] Expiring the last backup?
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2019-01-25 05:38:40 Re: Casting Integer to Boolean in assignment