Re: partition tree inspection functions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partition tree inspection functions
Date: 2018-07-31 02:11:27
Message-ID: 2ab396e6-9cad-f52f-1b1e-ace47aa82291@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Jesper,

On 2018/07/30 22:21, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> On 07/30/2018 05:21 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> As 0 is a valid return value for root nodes I think we should use -1
>>> instead for these cases.
>>
>> Makes sense, changed to be that way.
>>
>
> Looks good, the documentation for pg_partition_level could be expanded to
> describe the -1 scenario.

Done.

> New status: Ready for Committer

Thanks. Updated patch attached.

Regards,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Add-assorted-partition-reporting-functions.patch text/plain 27.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2018-07-31 02:51:04 pg_default_acl missing 'n' case in doc
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2018-07-31 01:43:50 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.