From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump --with-* options |
Date: | 2025-06-17 01:08:35 |
Message-ID: | 2aa1a6a1-6526-4895-8719-a0f9eb775deb@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025/06/17 9:58, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 07:09:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I find myself increasingly persuaded by Corey's point of view ...
>
> +1
Can you clarify how using on-by-default would simplify things?
I'm not sure it actually makes the options simpler.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2025-06-17 01:10:56 | BackendKeyData is mandatory? |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-06-17 01:02:48 | Re: pg_dump --with-* options |