Re: pg_dump --with-* options

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --with-* options
Date: 2025-06-17 01:08:35
Message-ID: 2aa1a6a1-6526-4895-8719-a0f9eb775deb@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025/06/17 9:58, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 07:09:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I find myself increasingly persuaded by Corey's point of view ...
>
> +1

Can you clarify how using on-by-default would simplify things?
I'm not sure it actually makes the options simpler.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2025-06-17 01:10:56 BackendKeyData is mandatory?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2025-06-17 01:02:48 Re: pg_dump --with-* options