Re: Large writable variables

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Large writable variables
Date: 2018-10-18 20:20:29
Message-ID: 2a909e88-ff6a-14e0-517b-eb974cd30005@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18/10/2018 22:17, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 17/10/2018 23:51, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> __builtin_types_compatible_p(const char *, char *) returns false (0) for me.
>>
>> Right, that's why I added a const, inside the macro, to the type
>> specified in the unconstify argument. So typeof() yields a const char *,
>> and the return type is specified as char *, and adding a const in the
>> argument also yields a const char *.
>
> Yeah, that works. The C++-inspired version also allowed casting from
> not-const to const, which we don't really need.

> Attached is my previous patch adapted to your macro.

Oh, I forgot to mention, your version doesn't work for this code in
pqexpbuffer.c:

str->data = (char *) oom_buffer;

That's probably not a big deal though.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-10-18 20:29:39 Re: Large writable variables
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-10-18 20:17:55 Re: Large writable variables