From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Design for In-Core Logical Replication |
Date: | 2016-07-23 01:31:07 |
Message-ID: | 2a7357c5-6b6b-045a-4e68-2eb9bdb8fb33@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/20/16 8:35 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I'm not sure how Petr's current design for in-core replication addresses
> this, if it does, or whether it's presently focused only on
> point-to-point replication like pglogical. As far as I'm concerned so
> long as it does direct point-to-point replication with no forwarding
> that's good enough for a first cut feature, so long as the UI, catalog
> and schema design leaves room for adding more later.
That's the part I'm pretty worried about. I'd feel a lot better if there
was at least a wiki page of future topology/communication features and a
sketch of a design.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-07-23 01:49:07 | Re: Proposal: revert behavior of IS NULL on row types |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-07-23 01:31:04 | Re: Design for In-Core Logical Replication |