| From: | Scott Lamb <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
| Subject: | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Date: | 2003-04-15 17:39:18 |
| Message-ID: | 2F466580-6F69-11D7-84B1-000393D581B8@slamb.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tuesday, Apr 15, 2003, at 12:35 US/Central, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Nor does your suggestion solve the problem of how to get the documents
> on the
> web page if the submitter doesn't have CVS access ....
I'm not sure I understand the CVS requirement as a big problem. I see
people not wanting CVS for two reasons:
- Requiring submitters to understand CVS. But honestly, I'm not sure
about the quality of any tech document written by someone who doesn't.
- Requiring submitters to have a CVS account. I've contributed via CVS
to many projects at which I have no account. I make a patch file and
send it to someone who does. I don't think that creates much more work
for me or them.
Scott
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | justin | 2003-04-15 17:46:50 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-04-15 17:35:07 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |