Re: 2021-09 Commitfest

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Date: 2021-10-04 18:38:06
Message-ID: 2EDDB9BB-CCC8-4BDA-9B27-236CAE6E6787@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 4 Oct 2021, at 18:51, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:05 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se <mailto:daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>> wrote:
> > On 4 Oct 2021, at 14:56, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net <mailto:magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> > Ugh. i missed one of the two checks. That's what I get for not testing properly when the change "was so simple"...
> >
> > Please try again.
>
> It works now, I was able to move a patch (3128) over to the 2021-11 CF. It
> does bring up the below warning(?) in a blue bar when the move was performed
> which at first made me think it hadn't worked.
>
> "The status of this patch cannot be changed in this commitfest. You must
> modify it in the one where it's open!"
>
> Did you try it with more than one patch? It could be a held back message that got delivered late (yes, there are some such cases, sadly). I ask because I'm failing to reproduce this one...

It was on the very same entry and I only tested that one, so it sounds likely
that it was a message that was late to the party.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2021-10-04 19:08:58 RfC entries in CF 2021-09
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-10-04 18:36:54 Re: [PATCH] Print error when libpq-refs-stamp fails