| From: | Alexander Staubo <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ruben Rubio <ruben(at)rentalia(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Optimization of this SQL sentence |
| Date: | 2006-10-17 15:32:12 |
| Message-ID: | 2D8F6D63-23DE-4350-840E-F66B151EE205@purefiction.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Oct 17, 2006, at 17:10 , Craig A. James wrote:
>> These tables are particularly egregious examples of ignorant
>> database design. You need to understand the relational model
>
> This email is a *particularly* egregious example of rudeness. You
> owe Mr. Staubo, and the Postgress community, an apology.
I'm sorry you feel that way, but I don't think I was out of line. I
did point to several informative sources of documentation, and
described some of the problems (but by no means all) with the
person's schema and how to solve them. If you think the database
design in question is *not* ignorant database design, please do
explain why, but on technical grounds. (Ignorance, of course, is not
a sin.)
Alexander.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Staubo | 2006-10-17 15:50:41 | Re: Optimization of this SQL sentence |
| Previous Message | Mario Weilguni | 2006-10-17 15:29:19 | Re: Optimization of this SQL sentence |