Re: GUC names in messages

> On 1 Nov 2023, at 10:02, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> GUC_check_errdetail("effective_io_concurrency must be set to 0 on
> platforms that lack posix_fadvise().");
> src/backend/commands/variable.c:
> GUC_check_errdetail("maintenance_io_concurrency must be set to 0 on
> platforms that lack posix_fadvise().");

These should be substituted to reduce the number of distinct messages that need
to be translated. I wouldn't be surprised if more like these have slipped
through.

> I had intended to make a patch to address the inconsistency, but
> couldn't decide which of those styles was the preferred one.

Given the variety in the codebase I don't think there is a preferred one.

> Then I worried this could be the tip of the iceberg

All good rabbit-holes uncovered during hacking are.. =)

> Ideally, they should all look the same everywhere, shouldn't they?

Having a policy would be good, having one which is known and enforced is even
better (like how we are consistent around error messages based on our Error
Message Style Guide).

--
Daniel Gustafsson