Re: Testing with concurrent sessions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Date: 2010-01-07 16:32:02
Message-ID: 2CE2E926-3AC0-4A20-8278-B343652B98C3@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 6, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> We have not yet fully accepted the notion that you must have Perl to
> build (and, in fact, I am right now trying to verify that you don't).
> I don't think that requiring Perl to test is going to fly.

I believe that the build farm already requires Perl, regardless of whether the PostgreSQL build itself requires it.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-07 16:37:12 Re: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2010-01-07 16:27:15 Re: Testing with concurrent sessions