|From:||Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>|
|To:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
> On 31 Aug 2017, at 04:42, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/30/17 13:28, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 30 Aug 2017, at 16:51, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Uh, why would anybody be reading the pg10 docs in order to compile
>>>> modules for 8.2? I vote to just drop the suggestion that there needs to
>>>> be an #ifdef guard altogether.
>>> +1 ... if you are reading the current docs, they're going to tell you
>>> lots of things that won't work in 8.1.
>> Patch updated with dropping the #ifdef guard paragraph. Also removed the
>> mention of when the magic block was introduced as it seemed an odd piece of
>> archaeology to keep around when the guard paragraph was removed.
|Next Message||Bruce Momjian||2017-08-31 13:23:24||Re: Confusing Trigger Docs.|
|Previous Message||Peter Eisentraut||2017-08-31 02:42:24||Re: Change wording for PG_MODULE_MAGIC inclusion|