| From: | David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements |
| Date: | 2021-11-03 21:50:20 |
| Message-ID: | 2B196FC4-160C-4390-B2BD-1936612BAFD7@pgguru.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Nov 3, 2021, at 5:35 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> On 15 Oct 2021, at 23:54, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca> wrote:
>>
>> I scanned through the GUC list and found that the following parameters can
>> potentially be categorized in the "special_disabled0" group, just for your
>> reference.
>
>
> This patch no longer applies, can you please submit a rebased version? Also,
> do you have any thoughts on Cary's suggestion in the above review?
Hi, enclosed is a v3, which includes the rebase as well as the additional int GUCs mentioned in Cary’s review. I can add support for Reals (required for the JIT and several other ones), but wanted to get feedback/buy-in on the overall idea first.
Best,
David
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| special-guc-values-v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 35.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-11-03 21:52:12 | Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-11-03 21:06:34 | Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V |